A Comment on Mohammed Nizami’s Messages Concerning our Critique

We recently published a seven-part series outlining the ideological component of the UAE-based post-Gaza plan. In the sixth part, we exposed Mohammed Nizami’s deformation of Islam by critiquing his “Abrahamic system of thought” based on a public lecture he delivered at Oxford University. This piece comments on some messages Nizami published recently on his Telegram channel concerning our article. Links to his Telegram messages are here and here.

The original critique of Nizami’s lecture can be found here.

Post-Gaza Plan Part V – Defending the anti-Palestinian “Abrahamic Family House” Supra-religion

This is the fifth article in a special Ramadan series. The series aims to uncover the ideological component to the post-Gaza plan based on UAE’s approach to deforming Islam and forcing an Israel-friendly secularism through the patriarchal figure of Abraham.

• Read Part I – “Denazification” and the UAE Blueprint
• Read Part II – The CVE-driven, Pro-Israeli, “Abrahamic Family House”
• Read Part III – The Christian-Zionist Beneficiaries of the “Abrahamic Family House” Project
• Read Part IV – The Secular Anti-Islam Foundations of the “Abrahamic Family House”

---

The scrutiny across the preceding three parts in this series exposed the UAE’s Abrahamic Family House project as a sinister plot to destroy the sanctity of Masjid Al-Aqsa. Part IV, in particular, elucidated how the Human Fraternity document, serving as the bedrock of the Abrahamic Family House, endeavours to weaken Islam and its unique identity in favour of instituting a novel religion that oversees and “unifies” all other faiths and traditions beneath its secular aegis.

Such an enterprise, of course, is consistent with the aims and objectives the Freemasons, who, in a parallel vein, establish a “brotherhood” (of currently five million members worldwide) grounded ostensibly on principles of fraternity, affection, relief, coupled with a strong ritualistic objective of rebuilding the temple of Soloman (upon him be peace). It is worth noting that there appears to be a mainstreaming and whitewashing of Freemasons, who are now targeting a younger audience. It is no coincidence that a recent puff piece in the Times highlighted that the initiation ceremony involved blindfolded candidates “swearing an oath on his choice of sacred text, including the Bible, Quran or Torah, promising never to write down the secrets of masonry.”

In any case, despite the abuse of the esteemed Prophet of Islam, Ibrahim (upon be peace), the architects of the document have been adamant that they are not propounding a new liquefying ideology that displaces or blurs Islam.